Showing posts with label European Union (withdrawal) Act 2018. Show all posts
Showing posts with label European Union (withdrawal) Act 2018. Show all posts

Tuesday, 31 October 2023

The REUL (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 - Third Update

Jane Lambert

 







The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill received royal assent on 29 June 2023 and is now law (see Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 ("REUL")),   I outlined the bill in Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill on 22 Oct 2022 and tracked its progress in my first and second updates on 6 Dec 2022 and 5 Feb 2023 respectively.

As I said in How Brexit has Changed IP Law on 17 Jan 2022the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 1988 incorporated  Council regulations and general principles of European law into the laws of England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland at 23|:00 from 31 Dec 2020 when EU law ceased to apply directly to the UK.  The incorporated principles entrenched EU legislation and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union into domestic law necessitating special procedures to depart from them.  REUL abolishes the entrenched status of retained EU Law and much of the implementing legislation.

Clause 1 (1) of the Bill, as introduced, would have revoked all "EU-derived subordinate legislation" and "retained direct EU legislation" on 31 Dec 2023.  "EU-derived subordinate legislation" was essentially secondary legislation made under s.2 (2) of, the European Communities Act 1972.  S.1 (1) of the Act limits the revocation to the legislation listed in Sched 1 of the Acr. Part 1 of that schedule lists subordinate legislation and Part 2 retained direct EU legislation.

In Retained EU law for intellectual property, the Intellectual Property Office has listed legislation which is to be revoked  at the end of this year:

The following statutory instruments will take effect from 1 Jan 2024:
Anyone wishing to discuss this article may call me on 020 7404 5252 during office hours or send me a message through my contact form.

Wednesday, 30 December 2020

The IP Provisions of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement

Author Furdur Source Wikipedia





















"The draft trade and cooperation agreement is 1,246 pages long and consists of the body and a very large number of annexes. The body is just under 400 pages long and is divided into 7 Parts subdivided into Titles and in some cases further divided into chapters. The remaining pages are the annexes."

I added that the most important part of the draft agreement appeared to be Part Two which governs trade in goods and services. Title V of that Part covers intellectual property. 

In contrast to Title IV of Part Three of the Withdrawal Agreement (Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community) which provides for the continued protection under national law of intellectual assets that are currently protected by EU law, Title V of Part Two of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement will not require immediate changes to national law.  "Intellectual property" is not even mentioned in the European Union (Future Relationship) Bill which was published late last night and which will ratify the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement.

The quite extensive changes to UK intellectual property legislation which will come into force at 23:00 on 31 Dec 2020 were agreed in the Withdrawal Agreement,  Indeed, some of these changes would have come into effect even if the UK had withdrawn from the European Union without a withdrawal agreement.  I have mentioned those changes in previous articles in this publication and in NIPC Law and I shall no doubt do so again,   In the meantime, the best summary of those changes is Intellectual Property after 1 Jan 2021 which is published on the British Intellectual Property Office website.  That article was last updated on 17 Dec 2020.

Title V of Part Two of the EU-UKTrade and Cooperation Agreement consists of 57 articles between page 125 and page 147 of the draft agreement.  The articles in that title are helpfully identified by the initials "IP".They cover the following topics:

  • Chapter 1 (arts IP1 to IP6) general provisions
  • Chapter 2  (arts IP7 to IP37) standards concerning intellectual property rights
    • Section 1 (arts IP7 to IP17) copyright and related rights
    • Section 2 (arts IP18 to IP26) trade marks
    • Section 3 (arts IP27 to IP31) designs
    • Section 4 (arts IP32 to IP33) patents
    • Section 5 (arts IP34 to IP IP36) undisclosed information
    • Section 6 (art IP37) plant varieties
  • Chapter 3 (arts IP38 to IP54) enforcement of intellectual property rights
    • Section 1 (arts IP38 to IP39) general obligations
    • Section 2 (arts IP40 to IP51) civil and administrative enforcement
    • Section 3 (art IP52) civil judicial procedures and remedies of trade secrets
    • Section 4 (arts IP53 and IP54) border enforcement
  • Chapter 4 (arts IP55 to IP57) other provisions.
The objectives of the title which are set out in art IP1 are as follows:
"(a) facilitate the production, provision and commercialisation of innovative and creative products and services between the Parties by reducing distortions and impediments to such trade, thereby contributing to a more sustainable and inclusive economy; and 
(b) ensure an adequate and effective level of protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights."
Art IP2 (1) provides that the title "shall complement and further specify the rights and obligations of each Party under the TRIPS Agreement and other international treaties in the field of intellectual property to which they are parties." 

In general, the title is structured very similarly to TRIPS which is of course annexe to the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization to which the UK, the EU and all its member states are party.  That includes the key provisions of the Enforcement and Trade Secrets Directives.  It should be remembered that s.3 (1) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 incorporates direct EU legislation into national law.

Anyone wishing to discuss this article or Title V of Part Two of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement may call me on +44 (0)20 7404 5252 during office hours or send me a message through my contact form.  In the meantime, I wish all my readers a happy and prosperous New Year.

Tuesday, 22 October 2019

European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill

Author O Flammger London (Stengel & Co. Dresden)
Source Wikipedia, The Palace of Westminster















Jane Lambert

If the revised draft withdrawal agreement that Her Majesty's government published on Saturday is to come into force, it has to be ratified by Parliament.  The bill that is intended to implement that legislation is the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill 2019-20. It was published while I was travelling from the World Intellectual Property Organization in Geneva to my home in Yorkshire so I have had only time only for the most cursory examination but readers will see that it is a very substantial piece of proposed legislation consisting of 40 clauses in 5 parts and no less than 6 schedules.

As I said yesterday in The Revised Draft Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration yesterday, the revised draft withdrawal agreement seems to have been achieved through major concessions some of which such as the proposed internal frontier between Great Britain and Northern Ireland will not be easy to justify.  The draft agreement has not been approved in principle by the House of Commons and the government proposes to allow Parliament no more than 3 days to scrutinize this instrument. With the best will in the world, that is a very tall order indeed.

Clause 1 of the bill would revise the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 by inserting a new s.1A after s.1:
"Savings for implementation period
1A  Saving for ECA for implementation period 
(1) Subsections (2) to (4) have effect despite the repeal of the European Communities Act 1972 on exit day by section 1. 
(2) The European Communities Act 1972, as it has effect in domestic law or the law of a relevant territory immediately before exit day, continues to have effect in domestic law or the law of the relevant territory on and after exit day so far as provided by subsections (3) to (5). 
(3)  The Act of 1972 has effect on and after exit day as if —
(a) the definitions of “the Treaties” and “the EU Treaties” given by section 1 (2) to (4) (interpretation)—
(i) included Part 4 of the withdrawal agreement (implementation period), other than that Part so far as it
relates to, or could be applied in relation to, the Common Foreign and Security Policy, but
(ii) were otherwise limited to anything which falls within those definitions as at immediately before exit day so far as it is not excluded by regulations made on or after exit day by a Minister of the Crown under this sub-paragraph,
(b) the reference in section 2 (2) to the objects of the EU were a reference to those objects so far as they are applicable to and in the United Kingdom by virtue of Part 4 of the withdrawal agreement,
(c)  section 2 (3) (payment of EU costs etc.) were omitted,
(d) in section 3 (decisions on, and proof of, EU Treaties and EU instruments etc.)—
(i) the references to the Treaties in subsections (1) and (2) included the withdrawal agreement, and
(ii) the words in brackets in subsection (1) only applied so far as they are in accordance with Part 4 of the withdrawal agreement,
(e) references in sections 5 and 6 (customs duties and common agricultural policy) to the common customs tariff of the EU, directly applicable EU provision, the exclusion of customs duties, EU arrangements and agricultural levies of the EU were to such things so far as they are applicable to and in the United Kingdom by virtue of Part 4 of the withdrawal agreement, and
(f)  in Part 2 of Schedule 1 (general definitions in relation to the EU)—
(i) in the definition of “EU customs duty”, the reference to directly applicable EU provision were to such provision so far as it is applicable to and in the United Kingdom by virtue of Part 4 of the withdrawal agreement, and
(ii) in the definition of “Member” in the expression member State”, after “EU” there were inserted “and for the purposes of this expression the United Kingdom is to be treated as if it were a member of the EU during the implementation period (within the meaning given by section 1A (6) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018)”.
(4) In this section “relevant territory” means the Isle of Man, any of the Channel Islands or Gibraltar. 
(5) Subsections (1) to (4) are repealed on IP completion day. 
(6)  In this Act—
“the implementation period” means the transition or implementation period provided for by Part 4 of the withdrawal agreement and beginning with exit day and ending on IP completion day;
“IP completion day” (and related expressions) have the same meaning as in the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2019 (see section 37 (1) to (5) of that Act); European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill
“withdrawal agreement” has the same meaning as in that Act (see section 37(1) and (6) of that Act). 
(7) In this Act—
(a) references to the European Communities Act 1972 are to be read, so far as the context permits or requires, as being or (as the case may be) including references to that Act as it continues to have effect by virtue of subsections (2) to (4) above, and
(b) references to any Part of the withdrawal agreement or the EEA EFTA separation agreement include references to any other provisions of that agreement so far as relating to that Part.”
Clause 2 of the bill would insert a new s.1B into the 2018 Act:
1B Saving for EU-derived domestic legislation for implementation period 
(1) Subsections (2) to (5) have effect despite the repeal of the European Communities Act 1972 on exit day by section 1. 
(2) EU-derived domestic legislation, as it has effect in domestic law immediately before exit day, continues to have effect in domestic law on and after exit day, subject as follows. 
(3) Any enactment which continues to have effect by virtue of subsection (2) is to be read, on and after exit day and so far as the context permitsor requires, as if— 
(a) any reference to an expression which is to be read in accordance with Schedule 1 to the Interpretation Act 1978 and is an expression defined by section 1 of, or Part 2 of Schedule 1 to, theEuropean Communities Act 1972 were a reference to that expression as defined by that section or that Part of that Schedule as it continues to have effect by virtue of section 1A(2) to (4) of this Act,
(b) any reference (however expressed and subject to paragraph (a)above) to—
(i) EU law,
(ii) any particular EU Treaty or any part of it,
(iii) any EU instrument, or other document of an EU entity or of the EU, or any part of any such instrument or document,
(iv ) any part of EU law not falling within sub-paragraph (ii) or (iii),
(v) any tax, duty, levy or interests of the EU, or
(vi) any arrangement involving, or otherwise relating to, theEU of a kind not falling within sub-paragraph (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (v), were a reference to any such thing so far as it is applicable to and in the United Kingdom by virtue of Part 4 of the withdrawal agreement,
(c)  any reference (however expressed and subject to paragraph (a) above) to the European Communities Act 1972 were or (as the case may be) included a reference to the Act of 1972 as it continues to have effect by virtue of section 1A (2) to (4) of this Act,
(d) any reference (however expressed) to the area of the EU or of the EEA included the United Kingdom,
(e) any reference (however expressed) to a citizen of the EU or a national of the EEA included a United Kingdom national (within the meaning given by Article 2 (d) of the withdrawal agreement), and 
(f) such other modifications were made as—
(i) are provided for by regulations under section 8A or Part 1A of Schedule 2, or
(ii) so far as not so provided, are necessary for any purpose of Part 4 of the withdrawal agreement and are capable of being ascertained from any such purpose or otherwise from that Part of that agreement. 
(4) Any EU-derived domestic legislation which is an enactment passed or made on or after exit day and before IP completion day is, unless the contrary intention appears, to be read in accordance with subsection (3) (and anything done or omitted to be done in connection with any such enactment is to be understood, and has effect, accordingly). 
( 5)  Subsections (2) to (4) are subject to any regulations made under section 8A or 23 or Part 1A of Schedule 2 or otherwise under this Act or under the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2019. 
(6) Subsections (1) to (5) are repealed on IP completion day. 
(7) In this Act “EU-derived domestic legislation” means any enactment so far as— 
(a) made under section 2 (2) of, or paragraph 1A of Schedule 2 to, the European Communities Act 1972,
(b) passed or made, or operating, for a purpose mentioned in section 2 (2) (a) or (b) of that Act,
(c) relating to—
(i) anything which falls within paragraph (a) or (b), or
(ii) any rights, powers, liabilities, obligations, restrictions, remedies or procedures which are recognised and available in domestic law by virtue of section 2 (1) of theEuropean Communities Act 1972, or 
(d) relating otherwise to the EU or the EEA, but does not include any enactment contained in the European Communities Act 1972 or any enactment contained in this Act or the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2019 or in regulations made under this Act or the Act of 2019.”
Clause 3 of the bill would enable a minister to correct any deficiencies arising from withdrawal by regulation inserting a new s.8A into the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.  Clause 4 would confer a corresponding power on the devolved authorities (that is to say, the governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland) by inserting a new Part 1A with new sections 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D, 11E and 11F into the Act.

Clause 5 would insert new s. 7A into the 2018 Act to implement the revised draft withdrawal agreement into the laws of the United Kingdom.  Clause 6 would insert a new s.7B to implement the agreements with the European Economic Area, European Free Trade Association and Switzerland.

Part 3 of the bill consists of 11 clauses (7 to 17) which give effect to the provisions on citizens; rights in the draft withdrawal agreement.

Clause 20 provides for the UK's financial settlement to be paid out of the Consolidated Fund or if the Treasury so decides the National Loans Fund.

Clause 21 would enable a Minister to make regulations to implement the new Northern Ireland protocol to the revised draft withdrawal agreement including the concerning internal frontier between Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Schedule 4 of the bill would insert a new Schedule 5A into the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 in relation to workers' rights.  In any new legislation relating to those rights, Paragraph 1 of that Schedule requires a Minister to  make a statement before its second reading to the effect that "in the Minister’s view the provisions of the Bill will not result in the law of the relevant part or parts of the United Kingdom failing to confer any workers’ retained EU right (a “statement of non-regression”)" or if he or she cannot make a statement of non-regression a statement that the House wishes to proceed with the bill.

There is, of course, a lot more to the bill than that but those provisions are significant enough in themselves.  Anybody wishing to discuss them or brexit generally should call me on 020 7404 5252 during office hours or send me a message through my contact form. 

Wednesday, 13 February 2019

The Patents (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018

Jane Lambert











In Patents if there’s no Brexit Deal 3 Oct 2018, I discussed the government's guidance Patents if there's no Brexit Deal 24 Sept 2018.  I wrote:
"With regard to patents and SPCs, the guidance notes that few areas of patent law derive from EU legislation. Pharmaceutical and agrochemical products are important exceptions in that SPCs provide an additional period of protection for those inventions after their patents run out. There are also special provisions for biotechnological inventions, compulsory licences for patented medicines and limitations to the scope of a patent monopoly to permit trials and tests and other activities. The note states that s.2 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 will preserve the relevant EU legislation and s.3 will incorporate it into our law."
Supplementary legislation to preserve rights subsisting under EU regulations has now been drafted. pursuant to s.8 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018,

The draft legislation is known as The Patents (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018,  There are 69 of those regulations divided into 8 Parts:
  • Part 1 (reg 1) Introduction (citation)
  • Part 2 (regs 2 - 4) Amendments to the Patents Act 1977
  • Part 3 (reg 5) Amendments to the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988
  • Part 4 (regs 6 - 17) Amendments to The Patents and Plant Variety Rights (Compulsory Licensing) Regulations 2002
  • Part 5 (reg 18) Amendments to the Patent Rules 2007
  • Part 6 (regs 19 - 36) Supplementary Plant Protection Certificates - Amendments to Reg (EC) No 1610/96
  • Part 7 (regs 37 - 50) Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceutical Patents - Amendments to Reg (EC) No 816/2006, and
  • Part 8 (regs 51 - 69) Supplementary Protection Certificates for Medicinal Products - Amendments to Reg (EC) No 469.2009. 
The Patents and Plant Variety Rights (Compulsory Licensing) Regulations2002 (SI 2002/247) implement parts of Directive 98/44/EC on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions. The EU regulations on supplementary protection certificates are directly effective.

SPC (supplementary protection certificates) extend the monopoly granted by a patent for up to 5 years after the patent's expiry to make up for the time needed to obtain regulatory approval for the distribution of the patented invention.   To make sure that SPCs continue to be available, the statutory instrument replaces references to the EU and its institutions or member states with references to the UK, the Intellectual Property Office and other British organizations.

I shall mention this draft legislation at the 11th Annual Forum on Pharma Biotech Patent Litigation in Amsterdam, 26 and 27 Feb 2019. Anyone wishing to discuss this article, the draft statutory instrument or patents and brexit generally should call me on 020 7404 5252 during office hours or sending me a message through my contact form. 

Wednesday, 3 October 2018

Patents if there’s no Brexit Deal
















Jane Lambert

Since the 23 Aug 2018 the Department for Exiting the European Union has been publishing guidance on how to prepare for Brexit if there is no withdrawal agreement (see Jane Lambert And if there is no deal ......... 24 Aug 2018).  These are indexed in How to prepare if the UK leaves the EU with no deal which was published on 24 Sept 2018.  Several of those guidance notes concern intellectual property including Patents if  there's no Brexit deal subtitled How the UK patent system would be affected if the UK leaves the EU in March 2019 with no deal published on 24 Sept 2018.

Like all the other guidance notes, this one opens with the statement:
"A scenario in which the UK leaves the EU without agreement (a ‘no deal’ scenario) remains unlikely given the mutual interests of the UK and the EU in securing a negotiated outcome."
It continues that negotiations are going well but the government has to be ready for all eventualities. It has published this and other other technical notes "to allow businesses and citizens to understand what they would need to do in a ‘no deal’ scenario, so they can make informed plans and preparations."

The note explains how our withdrawal from the EU without a deal would affect:
In respect of each of those topics the note sets out the position before and after 29 March 2019.

With regard to patents and SPCs, the guidance notes that few areas of patent law derive from EU legislation. Pharmaceutical and agrochemical products are important exceptions in that SPCs provide an additional period of protection for those inventions after their patents run out. There are also special provisions for biotechnological inventions, compulsory licences for patented medicines and limitations to the scope of a patent monopoly to permit trials and tests and other activities.  The note states that s.2 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 will preserve the relevant EU legislation and s.3 will incorporate it into our law.

The note is much less certain and hence less helpful when it comes to the UPC. It begins with the extraordinary statement 
"The Unified Patent Court will hear cases relating to European patents and the new unitary patent – both administered by the non-EU European Patent Office"
in the "Before 29 March 2019" section. That is simply not happening and is unlikely to happen in the next few months.  The note then contradicts itself in the last two sentences of that section:
"The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is not yet in force, with the start date being dependent on ratification of the Unified Patent Court Agreement by Germany. It is unclear whether the Unified Patent Court and unitary patent will start before 29 March 2019."
It describes the UPC as "an international patent court established through an international agreement (the Unified Patent Court Agreement) between 25 EU countries" without mentioning that art 84 (1) states that this agreement is open to membership only to EU member states or that the legislation that provides for the unitary patent is an EU regulation.

After 29 March 2019 the note suggests two different scenarios for the UPC:
  • The UPC Agreement will not come into force because the UK will leave the EU before Germany ratifies the agreement; or
  • The agreement does come into force in which case "there will be actions that UK and EU businesses, organisations and individuals may need to consider." These will include exploring whether it will be possible for the UK to remain within the UPC and unitary patent systems in a ‘no deal’ scenario". 
The note gives the following advice to businesses and other stakeholders if the agreement comes into force before the 29 March 2019 but the UK has to withdraw:
  • "UK, EU and third country businesses will still be able to use the Unified Patent Court and unitary patent to protect their inventions within the EU
  • any existing unitary patents (UPs) will give rise to patent protection within the UK with no action required by the right holder. The UP system will only come into force when the Unified Patent Court is operational. UPs will not be available to businesses until this point
  • provision will be made regarding the status of any pending cases before the Unified Patent Court at exit
  • UK, EU and third country businesses seeking protection in the UK for their inventions will need to use national patents (including patents available from the non-EU European Patent Office) and the UK court system."
The last section on correspondence addresses and confidentiality for UK patents is really concerned with addresses for service, representation in the European Patent Office and Intellectual Property Office and legal professional privilege.  As the EPO unlike the EU Intellectual Property Office, is not an EU institution, there is unlikely to be any change in the existing in the arrangements that relate to patents.  The position with regard to Community designs and EU trade marks will be different.

About the best advice in the guidance note is that "businesses may wish to seek legal advice on how these arrangements could affect their business model or intellectual property rights."  Advice which is repeated below:
"You should consider whether you need separate professional advice before making specific preparations."
That is a service that I am well placed to provide and very willing to give.

Anyone wishing to discuss this article or Brexit generally should call me on  +44 (0)20 7404 5252 during normal office hours or send me a message through my contact form

Tuesday, 3 July 2018

Brexit Briefing - June 2018

Author Mikelo 
Licence Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 2.0 Generic
Source: Wikimedia Commons

















Jane Lambert

Despite Lords' amendments and a threatened revolt by a number of Tory MPs, the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill received royal assent and is now law. I have removed my link to the bill and added one to the Act in the left hand column.

But from the government's point of view that was the only progress that it could celebrate.  Members of the Cabinet could not agree on mechanisms for avoiding a hard border with the Republic of Ireland. There were reports that the Rt Hon Michael Gove MP had torn up a report on a policy said to be favoured by the Prime Minister in a fit of pique (see  'Livid' Michael Gove rips up EU customs partnership report 30 June 2018 BBC website). Major employers like Airbus SE and BMW have been drawing up contingency plans for the UK's departure from the EU without a withdrawal agreement (see Hope for the best but prepare for the worst 22 June 2018).

A draft withdrawal agreement has been available since 28 Feb 2018 but many of its provisions are still to be agreed (see Brexit Briefing - February 2018 7 March 2018).  There has been progress as the European Council acknowledged in its Conclusions of 29 June 2018 but there is a great deal more still to do.    It expressed concern that no substantial progress had yet been achieved on agreeing a backstop solution for Ireland/Northern Ireland despite commitments undertaken by the UK in this respect in December 2017 and March 2018.  It also called for work to be accelerated with a view to preparing a political declaration on the framework for the future relationship. 

The lack of progress with such two issues is the reason for the nervousness of businesses like Airbus and BMW.  At the time that the draft was published there was every hope that the parties would reach an agreement before the 29 March 2019 that would allow integrated aerospace and automotive manufacturing across the Channel and North Sea to continue.  As every day passes such an outcome becomes less and less likely.  There is a growing chance that the UK will withdraw from the EU without any agreement at all.

Although most businesses seem to regard withdrawal without agreement as a bad thing some will find opportunity.   Regardless of whether such an outcome would be good or bad it has to be planned for and it is reassuring that many organizations are doing just that,

Anyone wishing to discuss this article or Brexit in general should call me on 020 7404 5252 or send send me a message through my contact form.

Interpretation of Assimilated Law - Dairy (UK) Ltd v Oatly AB

By Kim Hansen - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7421277   Jane Lambert On 11 Feb 2026, the Supreme C...